United States v. Wood

57 F. 3d 913 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Wood

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
57 F. 3d 913 (1995)

RW

Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Thomas Nathaniel Wood and his brother David Leslie Wood (defendants) for several drug-related offenses, including manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The trial evidence established that a National Forest Service pilot discovered three patches of marijuana plants growing in remote areas of National Forest land. A Forest Service ground investigation confirmed the aerial spottings. Forest Service officers set up a video camera in one patch and kept tabs on each patch to monitor the plants' condition through the summer and into the fall. On two occasions, videotapes showed the Wood brothers trimming the plants, apparently to promote their growth. On other occasions, officers visited the patches and found fresh tire tracks and footprints, along with evidence that the plants had been groomed, watered, fertilized, and in some cases harvested. When federal agents searched the brothers' residences and Thomas Wood's car, they found marijuana seeds, scales, plastic baggies, and assorted other drug paraphernalia, as well as marijuana plants and baggies full of processed marijuana. The Woods testified that they found the three Forest Service marijuana patches in the course of their woodland ramblings. The brothers said they took some leaves and seeds from the Forest Service marijuana plants for their own use, and took some marijuana plants from a nearby river, but they denied selling marijuana or doing anything to cultivate the Forest Service marijuana patches. The jury found both brothers guilty of manufacturing marijuana, and they appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership