United States v. Woodley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
751 F.2d 1008 (1985)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
In 1980, President Carter conferred a commission on Walter Heen to fill a judicial vacancy in the United States District Court for the District of Hawai’i while the United States Senate was in recess. The commission was issued pursuant to the Recess Appointment Clause of Article II of the United States Constitution. Judge Heen took his oath and began presiding over cases in federal court. Janet Woodley (defendant) was tried before Judge Heen for narcotics-related charges. Judge Heen denied Woodley’s motion to suppress evidence, and Woodley was subsequently found guilty of the charges. Woodley appealed the denial of her motion to suppress and argued that the Recess Appointment Clause does not give the president the power to temporarily appoint judicial officers because Article III of the Constitution forbids interim judicial appointments.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Beezer, J.)
Dissent (Norris, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.