United States v. Yossunthorn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
167 F.3d 1267 (1999)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Paiboon Mekvichitsang (co-defendant) regularly purchased distribution quantities of heroin from a pair of suppliers. Federal agents arrested one of the suppliers, who agreed to cooperate with the agents. The supplier called and told Mekvichitsang about a new shipment of heroin. Mekvichitsang and the supplier agreed to meet at a McDonald's restaurant to discuss whether Mekvichitsang wanted to buy any of the heroin, and if so, how much, at what price, and on what delivery terms. Before the appointed meeting time, Mekvichitsang and his assistant Sunthorn Yossunthorn (co-defendant) staked out the McDonald's to ensure the meeting's security. Soon thereafter, federal agents arrested Mekvichitsang and Yossunthorn. The United States government (plaintiff) successfully prosecuted the pair for conspiracy and attempted possession with intent to distribute heroin. The pair appealed their convictions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The issue in Mekvichitsang's case was whether his conduct constituted a substantial step toward acquiring heroin.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schwarzer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.