United States v. Young
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
613 F.3d 735 (2010)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted James William Young (defendant) for attempting to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The federal district court trial evidence established that Young and an undercover police officer posing as 14-year-old "Emily" agreed online to meet at a motel and have sex with each other. Young said he would reserve their room, and so that Young could recognize her, Emily described how she would dress. Young drove to the motel and attempted to check in, but the reception clerk refused his credit card. Young drove to a nearby automated teller machine (ATM) to withdraw cash to pay for the room. Young canceled the room reservation because there was not enough money in his ATM account. Young drove around the neighborhood and honked his horn and yelled when he spotted a girl dressed as Emily told him she would be. The girl was another undercover police officer. Other officers arrested Young, and a search turned up a condom, a note addressed to Emily, and a bottle of bubble bath in Young's possession. Young testified that he intended neither to complete the check-in process nor have sex with Emily, and that he drove around for the sole purpose of finding Emily and making sure she was safe. The judge denied Young's motion for a jury instruction on his abandonment defense, and the jury found him guilty. Young appealed to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shepherd, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.