United States v. Zandi
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
769 F.2d 229 (1985)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Hadi and Mehdi Zandi (defendants) were brothers living in the United States who had a third brother, Morteza, living in Pakistan. Hadi and Mehdi had telephone conversations with Morteza in which they discussed paying Morteza $3,000 for Morteza to mail them a box of “presents” that could then be sold in the United States. Hadi and Mehdi sent the money to Morteza, and Morteza send a package with a false shipping address to a post office box provided by Mehdi. After learning the package had been delivered to the United States, Mehdi and Hadi obtained the airway bill receipt and the carrier’s certificate. Mehdi paid the storage fee required to pick up the package, and requested the package at the warehouse. Upon learning that a customs inspector was present at the warehouse, however, Mehdi abruptly left. The warehouse staff became suspicious and alerted the customs official. The official inspected the package and discovered that it contained opium. The next day Hadi and Mehdi returned and again requested the package with the required documentation. After Hadi was handed the package, a custom official asked him to open it for inspection and Hadi complied, revealing the opium. Hadi and Mehdi were both arrested, charged, and convicted of possession of opium with the intent to distribute. Hadi and Mehdi appealed on the grounds that the government (plaintiff) failed to establish that they actually possessed the opium or had knowledge that opium was in the package.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murnaghan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.