United Steelworkers of America v. Marshall

647 F.2d 1189 (1980)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United Steelworkers of America v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
647 F.2d 1189 (1980)

  • Written by Jack Newell, JD
Play video

Facts

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (defendant), led by Marshall, promulgated a rule to protect workers from airborne lead. The United Steelworkers of America and the Lead Industry Association (LIA) (plaintiffs) sued OSHA, claiming that the process used in making the final rule was tainted by bias. The LIA cited a speech by the assistant secretary of labor (the decisionmaker on the final rule) in which she railed against organizations that attacked the proposal of new regulations on the lead industry. The LIA also cited ex parte communications between the decisionmaker and an attorney at OSHA, who they claimed advocated in favor of the rule that the regulators wanted, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Administrative Law
Employment Law

Key Terms