United Title Insurance Co. v. Commissioner

T.C. Memo. 1988–38 (1988)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United Title Insurance Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 1988–38 (1988)

Facts

United Title Insurance Company (United) (plaintiff), a small and relatively new real estate title-insurance company in North Carolina, operated in an intensely competitive industry. Facing significant competitive disadvantages, United focused its marketing efforts on building and maintaining close business relationships with select real estate professionals who could directly refer business to the company. Between 1977 and 1979, United held four out-of-state board meetings and planning conferences. United invited selected real estate attorneys, developers, realtors, and lenders to attend and participate in these events. Spouses and friends also attended some of the trips. On its federal income tax returns for those years, United deducted expenses related to these trips under § 162(a) of the tax code. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) disallowed the deductions, arguing that the expenses were not “ordinary and necessary” within the meaning of § 162(a) because no other title company in the state engaged in similar practices. United petitioned the tax court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership