Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States et al. ex rel. Escobar et al.
United States Supreme Court
136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016)
Arbour Counseling Services (Arbour) was a mental health facility and a subsidiary of Universal Health Services (Universal) (defendant). Arbour treated Yarushka Rivera for behavioral problems. At Arbour, Rivera was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Rivera then had an adverse reaction to a medication that a purported doctor at Arbour had prescribed her. As a result of the medication, Rivera suffered a seizure and died. Rivera’s parents (plaintiffs) discovered that most Arbour employees were not properly licensed. The practitioner who diagnosed Rivera identified herself as a psychologist with a Ph.D., but failed to mention that her degree came from an unaccredited online college and that the state rejected her application to be licensed as a psychologist. The practitioner who prescribed the medication to Rivera was held out as a psychiatrist, but was in fact a nurse who lacked authority to prescribe medication. When submitting reimbursement claims to Medicaid, Arbour staff members also misrepresented their qualifications and licensing status to the government. The state Medicaid program was unaware of the misrepresentation and paid the claims. Rivera’s parents filed a qui tam suit in federal court, alleging that Universal (through Arbour) failed to disclose violations of regulations relating to staff qualifications. Rivera’s parents also accused Universal of defrauding the Medicaid program. The trial court granted Universal’s motion to dismiss, holding that the regulations were not a condition of payment. The appellate court reversed, holding that a regulatory requirement can be a condition of payment by implication. The case was then brought before the Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.