University of Chicago v. Dater

277 Mich. 653, 270 N.W. 175 (1936)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

University of Chicago v. Dater

Michigan Supreme Court
277 Mich. 653, 270 N.W. 175 (1936)

Play video

Facts

George Dater (defendant) and John Price (defendant), both from Michigan, owned real property in Chicago, Illinois. Dater and Price entered into negotiations with the University of Chicago (university) (plaintiff) to borrow $75,000. Dater and Price offered the Chicago property as collateral for the loan. The university agreed to lend Dater and Price the money so long as title to the property was good. Dater and his wife, Nellie, along with Price and his wife, Clara, (defendants) executed promissory notes and a trust deed at a bank in Michigan. The documents were mailed from Michigan to the university’s agent in Chicago, where the trust deed was subsequently recorded. After John Price died, Clara became the owner of at least one-half of the Chicago property. Four years later, the property went into foreclosure because Clara could not make payments on the loan. The university filed suit in Michigan state court to collect on the promissory note. The trial court rendered a $15,536 judgment in favor of the university against George Dater. Additionally, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of Clara. The university appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiest, J.)

Dissent (Butzel, J.)

Dissent (Sharpe, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership