University of Illinois v. Barrett
Illinois Supreme Court
382 Ill. 321, 46 N.E.2d 951 (1943)
Facts
The University of Illinois was created by the Illinois legislature in 1867 as the result of a land grant provided to the state of Illinois by Congress. Members of the Board of Trustees (petitioners) of the university were elected by citizens of the state during general elections. Johnson (petitioner) was a professor and counsel for the university, while Hodges (petitioner) was assistant counsel. Both were to be paid salaries by the university through state appropriations made to the university from the state legislature. Though the appropriations made to the university from the state legislature did not include funding for university counsel or assistant counsel, the university had always included funding for these positions in its budget submitted to the legislature, and such funding had always been provided by the legislature. A lawsuit, unrelated to this case, was filed against the University of Illinois. Subsequently, the Board of Trustees, and Johnson and Hodges, individually, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Illinois Supreme Court against the state’s Attorney General and Auditor of Public Accounts to compel the Auditor to pay to the university the funding necessary to pay the salaries for Johnson and Hodges, and to prevent the Attorney General from interfering with Johnson and Hodges acting as counsel for the Board of Trustees in the lawsuit pending against the university.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.