University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
United States Supreme Court
493 U.S. 182 (1990)
In 1985, the University of Pennsylvania (the University) (defendant), a private university operating the Wharton School of Business, refused to give tenure to Rosalie Tung (plaintiff), an associate professor. Tung filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that she had been subject to sexual harassment, was equally qualified for tenure as her male peers, and had been denied tenure because the University did not want a Chinese American woman as a tenured professor. As part of an investigation into Tung’s complaint, the EEOC issued a subpoena to the University demanding files related to Tung’s peer review for tenure, as well as files related to the review of the other male candidates. The University asked the EEOC to exclude certain documents from the subpoena, including confidential letters, evaluations, and internal deliberations by the evaluators and department chair who had reviewed Tung and the other applicants. Even though the EEOC declined to exclude the items from the subpoena, the University refused to turn over the requested materials. The EEOC filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, seeking enforcement of the subpoena. The court granted an enforcement order, which was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on appeal. The University appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 706,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 706,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,400 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.