University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

985 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2021)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
985 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2021)

SC

Facts

A trainee and a visiting researcher at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Anderson) (plaintiff) each lost a USB drive containing individuals’ electronic protected health information (ePHI). The USB drives were not encrypted. Additionally, an Anderson faculty member had a laptop stolen. The laptop was not encrypted or password-protected and also contained individuals’ ePHI. Under the encryption rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), all entities covered by HIPAA were required to implement a mechanism to encrypt and decrypt ePHI. The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (defendant) imposed a civil penalty of $4,348,000 against Anderson for violation of this requirement. Anderson challenged the penalty in federal court. Anderson presented evidence that it had implemented an encryption mechanism. Anderson also presented evidence that HHS had seen other companies violate the encryption rule in the past without imposing any civil penalties.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oldham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership