University Professors Case
France Constitutional Court
83-165 DC of 20 January 1984 (1984)
- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
In May 1968, university students engaged in widespread demonstrations, protesting the nature of higher education in France. In response, a series of changes were implemented to democratize the French higher-education system. The reforms included the breakup of large faculties into smaller units of study and research run by tenured professors. Under the new systems, tenured professors and groups of nontenured assistants taught university courses. Tenured professors directed and operated the universities, including preparing academic programs, coordinating teaching teams, and making decisions on promoting teachers and researchers. Each university had a governing council elected from a single electoral group of tenured professors, nontenured teachers and researchers, and library and museum personnel. Within the electoral body, tenured professors were a minority, outnumbered by nontenured teachers and researchers. The tenured professors (plaintiffs) challenged the new university-governance system, arguing that the governance structure failed to protect the tenured professors’ constitutional right to academic and educational independence. Furthermore, the professors contended that, as a minority in the single governing body of a university, the tenured professors lacked a means of protecting their educational freedom from the political interests of the majority.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.