Unwired Planet International Ltd. v. Huawei Technologies Co.
England and Wales Court of Appeal
[2018] EWCA (Civ) 2344 (2018)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Unwired Planet International Limited (UPI) (plaintiff) owned five patents that it declared to be standard-essential patents (SEPs), or patents that are essential to the implementation of a telecommunication standard. These patents were part of a worldwide portfolio. Huawei Technologies Company Limited (Huawei) (defendant) refused to agree to a global license for use of the patents offered by UPI. UPI contended that the license offered to Huawei was fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND). UPI sued Huawei in the England and Wales High Court of Justice for patent infringement and asked the court to enjoin Huawei from further infringement of the patents. The court found that UPI’s global license was FRAND and granted the injunction against Huawei. Huawei appealed, arguing that a court in one country may not decide whether a global license that sets rates for countries outside of that court’s jurisdiction is a FRAND license.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kitchin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.