Urgenda Foundation v. Netherlands
The Netherlands Supreme Court
Case No. 19/00135 (2019)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In 1992 the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was established to stabilize the amount of greenhouse gas within the atmosphere and mitigate climate change. The UNFCC obligated all signatory states to enact measures to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. In 2019 the Netherlands Supreme Court considered a case filed by Urgenda Foundation (the foundation) (plaintiff), a Dutch environmental group, against the Netherlands (defendant). The foundation claimed that the Netherlands had failed to fulfill its obligation to enact measures to deter climate change, which violated its citizens’ rights to life in Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the human rights convention). The Netherlands claimed it was not obligated to take measures against climate change, because climate change was caused by global actions and had global effects. Therefore, the Netherlands claimed climate change was not specific enough to the Netherlands to fall within the scope of the human rights convention. The court considered the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Streefkerk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.