US West Communications, Inc. v. Office of Consumer Advocate

498 N.W.2d 711 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

US West Communications, Inc. v. Office of Consumer Advocate

Iowa Supreme Court
498 N.W.2d 711 (1993)

LJ

Facts

US West, Inc. (West) owned US West Communications, Inc., and US West Real Estate, Inc. (collectively, the US companies) (defendants). In 1991 the Denver Business Journal published a series of articles about the US companies and their leasing practices. Specifically, the articles alleged that the US companies established inflated lease rates during leasing transactions among the US companies and that the inflated costs were then passed on to their ratepayers. In 1992 the US companies were engaged in rate proceedings, and the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) commenced an investigation regarding the reasonableness of its leasing activities. As part of the investigation, the OCA obtained documents pertaining to the US companies under an agreement of confidentiality. Specifically, the agreement provided that documents would not be released until West could litigate the question of whether the documents met an exemption for disclosure. Thomas Locke (plaintiff), a news writer, filed a request for the documents that the US companies had provided to the OCA pursuant to Iowa’s open-records law. The US companies filed an action against the OCA to prevent the release of its lease information. The US companies contended that the lease information constituted trade secrets and reports to government agencies that would afford their competitors an unfair advantage if released under the open-records law. Locke claimed that the lease information did not meet these exceptions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schultz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership