US West Communications, Inc. v. Office of Consumer Advocate
Iowa Supreme Court
498 N.W.2d 711 (1993)

- Written by Laura Julien, JD
Facts
US West, Inc. (West) owned US West Communications, Inc., and US West Real Estate, Inc. (collectively, the US companies) (defendants). In 1991 the Denver Business Journal published a series of articles about the US companies and their leasing practices. Specifically, the articles alleged that the US companies established inflated lease rates during leasing transactions among the US companies and that the inflated costs were then passed on to their ratepayers. In 1992 the US companies were engaged in rate proceedings, and the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) commenced an investigation regarding the reasonableness of its leasing activities. As part of the investigation, the OCA obtained documents pertaining to the US companies under an agreement of confidentiality. Specifically, the agreement provided that documents would not be released until West could litigate the question of whether the documents met an exemption for disclosure. Thomas Locke (plaintiff), a news writer, filed a request for the documents that the US companies had provided to the OCA pursuant to Iowa’s open-records law. The US companies filed an action against the OCA to prevent the release of its lease information. The US companies contended that the lease information constituted trade secrets and reports to government agencies that would afford their competitors an unfair advantage if released under the open-records law. Locke claimed that the lease information did not meet these exceptions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schultz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.