USCF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland v. Superior Court of California, City of Alameda

2016 WL 4495093 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

USCF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland v. Superior Court of California, City of Alameda

California Supreme Court (Petition for Review)
2016 WL 4495093 (2016)

Facts

Thirteen-year-old Jahi McMath (plaintiff) went into cardiac arrest after a surgical procedure at USCF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland (Children’s Hospital) (defendant). Two medical professionals determined that McMath’s brain function had irreversibly ceased, and they pronounced her dead in accordance with California’s Uniform Determination of Death Act. A death certificate was issued. McMath’s mother, Latasha Winkfield (plaintiff), petitioned to compel Children’s Hospital to provide medical treatment to McMath, whom Winkfield asserted was still alive. In a probate action, a court-appointed specialist in child neurology confirmed McMath’s irreversible brain death, as did the two physicians who made the initial determination. The probate court issued a final order on the subject. Winkfield did not challenge the probate court’s findings or final order, but she did initiate a series of civil proceedings on McMath’s behalf to collaterally attack the determination of death. At various points, Winkfield claimed that changed circumstances warranted reconsideration of McMath’s medical state. Winkfield’s civil actions included a personal-injury action with which the Alameda County Superior Court allowed Winkfield to proceed. Children’s Hospital petitioned the California Court of Appeal for a writ of mandate to preclude Winkfield’s efforts to overturn McMath’s death certificate on grounds of collateral estoppel, which was denied. Children’s Hospital then petitioned the California Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership