Utah Association of Counties v. Bush
United States District Court for the District of Utah
316 F.Supp. 2d 1172 (2004)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
In 1996, under authority of the Antiquities Act (act), President William Clinton designated 1.7 million acres of federal land in Utah as the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. In the written proclamation, Clinton noted that the monument contained geologic treasures such as rock layers that offered insight into the processes of the earth’s formation and diverse objects including arches, natural bridges, and exposed sandstone and shale deposits that were outstanding for purposes of geologic study. He additionally noted that there were (1) world-class paleontological sites including specimens of petrified wood and significant fossils, (2) archeological interests in Anasazi and Fremont cultures of significant scientific and historic value for future study, and (3) an impressive array of unusual and diverse soils that warranted protection. The proclamation also indicated that the designated area for the monument was the smallest area consistent with the protection of the monument’s resources. In 1997, the Utah Association of Counties (UAC) (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against the United States and various officials of the federal government (collectively, the United States) (defendant), alleging that the United States violated the act. The United States filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and UAC filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Benson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.