Utah Housing Finance Agency v. Smart
Utah Supreme Court
561 P.2d 1052 (1977)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The Utah legislature created the Utah Housing Finance Agency (the agency) (plaintiff). The agency was authorized to obtain funds by issuing bonds and notes and was required to use those funds to provide financing for low- and moderate-income housing. By requiring the agency to finance low- and moderate-income housing, the legislature sought to prevent the creation of blighted areas. Additionally, the legislature stated that debt incurred by the agency through the issuance of bonds and notes was payable only out of the agency’s funds. The legislature appropriated some funds to the agency to cover its initial expenses, but the state director of finance, Herbert Smart (defendant) refused to disburse the funds, contending that the creation of the agency was unconstitutional. Subsequently, the agency brought suit, requesting a declaratory judgment that the creation of the agency was constitutional. The trial court granted the agency’s request for a declaratory judgment. Smart appealed to the Utah Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ellett, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.