Utah School Boards Association v. Utah State Board of Education
Utah Supreme Court
17 P.3d 1125 (2001)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
In 1998, the Utah state legislature passed the Utah Charter Schools Act (the act). The act authorized the creation of up to eight charter schools for a three-year pilot program. The charter schools were public schools. Under the act, the Utah State Board of Education (the state board) (defendant) had a supervisory role. The state board reviewed charter-school applications, worked with applicants to formulate charters, determined funding allocation, and terminated charter schools for certain specified reasons. The Utah School Boards Association (the association) (plaintiff) sued the state board, seeking a declaratory judgment that the act violated the state constitution. According to the association, the state constitution granted the state board “general control and supervision” powers over public schools, which meant universal or central control and not particularized or local control. The association argued that the legislature could not grant the state board authority to supervise local and specific matters like approving charter schools or reallocating local funding to charter schools. On motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled in favor of the state board, finding that the act did not violate the state constitution. The association appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Russon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.