From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Walker & Co. v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Michigan
81 N.W.2d 352 (1957)
Harrison (defendant) operated a dry-cleaning business. Walker & Co. (Walker) (plaintiff) sold, rented, and serviced advertising signs and billboards. Harrison and Walker entered into an agreement whereby Walker agreed to build and install a neon electric sign on Harrison’s property that would be leased to Harrison for a term of thirty-six months at $148.50 per month. The lease also provided that Walker would maintain the sign during the lease, and that title to the sign would revert to Harrison at the end of the lease. Walker completed and installed the sign in July 1953. Harrison made one payment for the month of August, but then noticed maintenance issues with the sign. The sign was hit with a tomato, and Harrison complained of rust and cobwebs in the sign’s corners. Harrison contacted Walker to request the maintenance of the sign he believed he was due under the contract, but Walker did not perform the requested maintenance. Harrison informed Walker by telegraph that he would make no further payments on the sign. A week later, Walker cleaned the sign. Walker then sent a letter to Harrison stating that if Harrison stopped paying rent, the matter would be turned over for collection to Walker’s attorney. Harrison made no additional payments, and Walker sued for the entire balance due under the contract, or $5,197.50. Harrison counterclaimed for damages on the ground that Walker breached its contractual obligation to perform maintenance on the sign. The trial court granted judgment for Walker amounting to the cash price of the sign, the services and maintenance by Walker that were already extended and accepted by Harrison, and interest for the amount owed by Harrison. Harrison appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.