Xiaodong Li v. Gonzales

420 F.3d 500, 429 F.3d 1153 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Xiaodong Li v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
420 F.3d 500, 429 F.3d 1153 (2005)

Facts

Xiaodong Li (plaintiff) was a Chinese Christian living in China. Although China recognized five religions, including Christianity, strict regulations required the registration of religious groups with the Religious Affairs Bureau. Registered religious groups were overseen by patriotic religious committees. These committees were political organizations that promoted patriotism and supervised government-sanctioned churches as part of China’s requirement that registered churches promote communism and change any teachings that conflicted with socialism. Any religious practices that did not occur at the location of churches registered with the government and supervised by the patriotic committees were illegal. Like millions of religious citizens, instead of attending a government-sanctioned church, Li and his friend Gao Ying engaged in religious activity at Li’s home with a group of six or seven others by reading the Bible and singing hymns. This unregistered activity took place for over five years until the police learned about it and arrested Li as a reactionary. Li was beaten until he confessed to establishing an underground church and hosting an illegal gathering that was against the government. Before Li’s scheduled hearing on these charges, he fled to the United States (defendant), but he did not initially request asylum because he hoped to return to China someday when conditions improved. After nearly three years in America, Li learned that his friend Gao Ying had been arrested, Li’s family members had been interrogated, and the police were searching for him for having sent religious materials to China while in America. An immigration judge (IJ) did not grant Li asylum, because Li had missed the one-year application deadline. However, the IJ did grant Li withholding from removal, finding China’s law prohibiting religious activities that were not registered was a form of institutional persecution targeting people whose religious practices could not be dictated by the government. The IJ found it more likely that not that Li would face persecution for his past religious activity if he returned to China. The Immigration and Naturalization Service appealed, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed, ruling that Li would not face persecution on account of his religion but rather prosecution for violating a law against unregistered religious practices, which China had a right to enforce. Li petitioned for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership