XL Specialty Ins. Co., as Subrogee of Chowaiki & Co., Fine Art Ltd. v. Christie’s Fine Art Storage Services, Inc.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
137 A.D.3d 563 (2016)
- Written by Nicole Gray , JD
Facts
Chowaiki & Co., Fine Art Ltd. (Chowaiki), a private art gallery, entered an agreement with Christie’s Fine Art Storage Services, Inc. (Christie’s) (defendant) to store some of its fine-art pieces for one year. The storage agreement gave Chowaiki an option to (1) have Christie’s accept liability for loss or damage to the goods limited by the lower of $100,000 or the market value of goods or (2) sign a loss or damage waiver, which included an insurance requirement and a waiver of subrogation. Chowaiki opted for the loss/damage waiver. Chowaiki’s artwork was stored on the first floor of Christie’s and was damaged during Hurricane Sandy by floodwater. Christie’s flooded in a storm prior to Hurricane Sandy, with little damage to any artwork because first-floor pieces were elevated. Christie’s emailed Chowaiki prior to the storm’s landfall that precautions would be taken to protect the artwork; however, Chowaiki’s artwork was damaged. XL Specialty Insurance Co., as subrogee of Chowaiki & Co., Fine Art Ltd. (XL) (plaintiff), paid for damages to the artwork and sued Christie’s for subrogation. A motion court found that the storage agreement created a bailor/bailee relationship between Chowaiki and Christie’s and that the waiver of subrogation contained in the loss/damage waiver was enforceable, barring this action. XL appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.