Yacovelli v. Moeser

324 F. Supp. 2d 760 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yacovelli v. Moeser

United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
324 F. Supp. 2d 760 (2004)

Facts

The University of North Carolina (UNC) conducted a freshmen orientation program prior to the beginning of classes. One purpose of the program, among several, was to promote critical thinking and discussion among students around a specific topic. During the 2002 orientation program, UNC assigned portions of a book about the Qur’an for students to read. Initially, UNC required all incoming freshmen to read the book and write a paper about the book. Later, UNC revised the assignment to allow students who had a religious objection to the book to write a paper discussing why they chose not to read the book. The papers were collected but not graded, and students were to attend a discussion group about the assignment with other students who may, or may not, have read the book. Certain incoming freshmen (students) (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit, alleging that UNC violated their constitutional rights by assigning a book that positively portrayed Islam.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tilley, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership