Yahoo! Inc.: Notice of Application

Investment Company Act Release No. 24459 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yahoo! Inc.: Notice of Application

Securities and Exchange Commission
Investment Company Act Release No. 24459 (2000)

CS

Facts

Yahoo! Inc., an internet media company, owned 34 percent of the voting securities of Yahoo! Japan, which managed a Japanese version of Yahoo!’s web-directory service. These securities accounted for more than 40 percent of the value of Yahoo’s total unconsolidated assets, excluding government securities and cash, which, absent an exemption, could have made Yahoo! an investment company under § 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Company Act). Pursuant to § 3(b)(2) of the Company Act, Yahoo! applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for an order that would exempt Yahoo! from investment-company status by declaring Yahoo! to be primarily engaged in a business other than investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, either directly or through majority-owned subsidiaries or controlled companies in a similar business. In its application, Yahoo! said it maintained short-term investments to manage its cash position (cash-management investments) but did not seek to profit by trading those investments. Yahoo! also said it made small, noncontrolling investments in other companies (strategic investments), not because of the potential to realize gains from increases in the companies’ stock prices but to develop or deepen business relationships with them. Combined, Yahoo!’s cash-management and strategic investments represented less than 15 percent of Yahoo!’s total assets. More than 90 percent of Yahoo!’s total unconsolidated assets, excluding cash and government securities, were attributable to noninvestment security assets, the ownership of its subsidiaries, and Yahoo! Japan, in which Yahoo! held a controlling interest. Yahoo! stated that it had always been focused primarily on providing internet-related products and services and that it held itself out to the public accordingly. In reports to the SEC and investors, Yahoo!’s operating income consistently figured more prominently than its investment income and the potential appreciation in value of its investments. Yahoo! maintained that its directors and officers spent very little time on investment matters and focused nearly all their attention on Yahoo!’s business operations. Yahoo! said that operating income, as opposed to investment income, comprised a majority of its gross income and that the vast majority of its revenues were generated from operating activities rather than its investments.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership