Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

102 Ohio St. 3d 205, 808 N.E.2d 861, 2004-Ohio-2491 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court
102 Ohio St. 3d 205, 808 N.E.2d 861, 2004-Ohio-2491 (2004)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

In 1997, Amanda, a ninth-grade student at Mansfield Senior High School (defendant), reported that Donald Coots, a coach and teacher at the school, sexually abused her. The school investigated, but no action was taken against Coots and the school did not report Amanda’s allegations to law enforcement or children’s services. In 2000, Coots sexually abused Ashley Yates (plaintiff), a 15-year-old student. The abuse was reported to the principal. Coots admitted to the abuse, was forced to resign, and was ultimately convicted of sexual battery. Yates’s parents (plaintiffs) sued the Mansfield Board of Education (Board) (defendant), arguing that the Board’s failure to report Amanda’s abuse allegations in 1997, despite being a mandatory reporter, was the proximate cause of Coots being able to abuse Ashley in 2000. The Board countered, arguing that it was a political subdivision entitled to sovereign immunity from any damages caused by its failure to report Amanda’s 1997 allegations. The trial court granted the Board summary judgment, holding that the Board was entitled to sovereign immunity. The appellate court affirmed, further holding that the Board’s failure to report Amanda’s abuse allegations only resulted in liability for Amanda’s injuries, not Ashley’s later injuries, because liability for failure to comply with mandatory reporting requirements did not extend to subsequent victims of the alleged abuser. The Yateses appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Resnick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership