Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N.P.

767 N.W.2d 34 (Ct. Minn. App. 2009)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N.P.

Minnesota Court of Appeals

767 N.W.2d 34 (Ct. Minn. App. 2009)

Facts

Candace Yath (plaintiff) visited Fairview Clinics, N.P., doing business as Fairview Cedar Ridge Clinic (the Clinic) (defendant), to be treated for a sexually transmitted disease. Navy Tek (defendant), a medical assistant at the Clinic who was related to Yath’s ex-husband, recognized Yath and accessed her medical file without authorization. Tek learned of Yath’s medical diagnosis as well as information related to Yath’s new sex partner and relayed the information to another Clinic employee, Net Phat (defendant), who in turn, disclosed it to others, including Yath’s ex-husband. Subsequently, the Clinic investigated the unauthorized access to Yath’s medical file and eventually fired Tek. Shortly thereafter, a MySpace.com webpage emerged showing Yath’s photo, name, and stating that she had a sexually transmitted disease and had cheated on her spouse. The webpage was created at a business where Tek’s sister, Molyka Mao (defendant), was employed. Yath sued Tek, Mao, Phat, and the Clinic for invasion of privacy, breach of a confidential relationship, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and for violating Minnesota law related to unauthorized disclosure of a person’s medical information. Yath subsequently dismissed the claims against Mao and Tek. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Clinic and Phat. Yath appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ross, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership