Yellott v. Underwriters Insurance Co.

915 So. 2d 917 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yellott v. Underwriters Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal
915 So. 2d 917 (2005)

Facts

M. Jayne Yellott (plaintiff) was injured when her car collided with a Sabine Pools, Inc. pickup truck driven by David Bunch. Yellott sued Sabine Pools and its insurer, Underwriters Insurance Company (defendants). At trial, Yellott testified that she was traveling in the right lane of a highway and decided to pass Bunch’s truck. Yellott said that when she was in the left lane to pass, Bunch suddenly began making a left turn and collided with Yellott’s car. Bunch testified that he had turned lawfully but that Yellott was traveling at approximately 90 miles per hour and had not noticed Bunch’s turn signal. Bunch and his passenger, Michael LeLeux, both testified that they measured skid marks on the highway after the collision. Although there were many skid marks, LeLeux and Bunch claimed that a set of skid marks traveling from the right lane into the left lane were the marks made by Yellott’s car. Sabine Pools argued based on this testimony that Yellott had not moved into the left lane until Bunch had already started turning. Trooper Ronald Mann, who investigated the accident, also testified that he had examined the skid marks. Mann stated that the skid marks from Yellott’s vehicle were entirely in the left lane, which was consistent with Yellott’s version of events. Mann also testified based on the skid marks that Yellott was traveling at 70 miles per hour, rather than 90 miles per hour. Mann said that he issued a citation to Bunch at the scene based on what he believed the skid marks showed about the vehicles’ locations just before the accident. The jury found both drivers equally at fault, and both sides appealed. Yellott claimed that the trial court erred in admitting Bunch and LeLeux’s lay opinion testimony about the skid marks, and Sabine Pools argued that the trial court erred in admitting Mann’s lay opinion testimony that Bunch was at fault for the accident.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thibodeaux, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership