Yellowbook Inc. v. Brandeberry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
708 F.3d 837 (2013)
- Written by Meagan Messina, JD
Facts
In 1994, Steven Brandeberry (defendant) entered into an asset-purchase agreement and license agreement with a phonebook company under the unregistered mark AMTEL (the 1994 agreement). Brandeberry signed the agreements individually and as president of American Telephone Directories, Inc. (American Telephone). Brandeberry marketed the directory as AMTEL, but never registered the AMTEL mark. In 2002, Brandeberry sold AMTEL to Barney White (the 2002 agreement). The only signed contract on record transferred the entirety of the AMTEL business to White. White later registered the AMTEL mark with the state of Ohio. In 2007, White sold the business in its entirety to Yellowbook, Inc. (Yellowbook) (plaintiff). In 2009, after the 2008 expiration of White’s registration, Brandeberry registered the AMTEL name and started a rival phonebook business. Yellowbook sued, alleging trademark infringement and interference with business relations. Brandeberry counterclaimed for defamation. The district court found for Brandeberry on the trademark infringement and tortious interference claims against Brandeberry personally and the trademark-infringement claim against his company, but the court found for Yellowbook on the tortious interference claim against Brandeberry’s corporation. Yellowbook appealed the district court’s denial of summary judgment on Yellowbook’s trademark-infringement claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boggs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.