Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Yick Wo v. Hopkins

United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 356 (1886)


 

Facts

In 1880, San Francisco passed an ordinance that required operators of laundries in buildings not made of brick or stone to apply for a permit to continue operation. At the time, 320 of the laundries in San Francisco were constructed of wood. Yick Wo and Wo Lee (defendants) were laundry operators of Chinese descent. They and over 200 other laundry operators of Chinese descent sought permits to continue their operations. All but one of their requests were denied. However, 80 of 81 similarly situated laundry operators who were not of Chinese descent were granted permits. Yick Wo and Wo Lee were fined and imprisoned after they continued to operate their laundries without permits. Yick Wo appealed to the California Supreme Court, which affirmed his conviction. Wo Lee filed a habeas corpus petition in federal court, but the court denied relief. Yick Wo and Wo Lee appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Matthews, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 450,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 450,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial