Supreme Court of Oklahoma
237 P.3d 145 (2010)
Nancy Ynclan (plaintiff) and Nolan Ynclan (defendant) were married for 12 years and had four children. In February 2008, Nancy filed for divorce. In January 2009, the case went to trial. On the second day of trial, the trial judge conducted private, in camera interviews with the three oldest children. Nancy, Nolan, and their attorneys were not present during the interviews. The only person present other than the trial judge and the three children was a court reporter. The purpose of the in camera interviews was for the trial judge to discern the custody preferences of the three oldest children in a safe, comfortable environment. Following the interviews, Nolan requested the transcript of the children’s interviews. Nolan’s request for the transcript was denied. Nancy was granted the divorce and awarded custody of the children. Nolan appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kauger, J.)
Dissent (Watt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.