Yñiguez v. Arizonans for Official English
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
69 F.3d 920 (1995)
- Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD
Facts
Arizonians for Official English (AOE) (defendant) started a petition drive to amend the Arizona constitution in October 1987. AOE sought to amend the Arizona constitution to prohibit the government’s use of any language except English. In 1988, the proposed amendment won a ballot initiative by 50.5 percent of voters. Article XXVIII of the Arizona Constitution made English the official language of the state and government, including state and government employees. Article XXVIII also imposed employment sanctions for any government employee who violated it. Yñiguez (plaintiff) worked on medical malpractice suits against the state in the Arizona Department of Administration. Before Article XXVIII, Yñiguez communicated in Spanish with monolingual Spanish-speaking claimants, and she spoke in English and Spanish with bilingual claimants. After Article XXVIII, Yñiguez stopped speaking Spanish at work because she feared the disciplinary reaction. Yñiguez sued AOE. Yñiguez argued that Article XXVIII was facially overbroad and entirely invalid, because it unlawfully prevented her from speaking Spanish with Spanish-speaking claimants, it chilled the rights of many employees, officials, and officers of the state, and it limited the interests of many non-English speaking Arizonans to receive information from the government. The district court ruled for Yñiguez, concluding that Article XXVIII violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.