Yohay v. City of Alexandria Employees Credit Union, Inc.

827 F.2d 967 (1987)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Yohay v. City of Alexandria Employees Credit Union, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
827 F.2d 967 (1987)

Facts

Stephen Yohay (plaintiff) was engaged in a custody dispute with his ex-wife, Patricia Ryan, who was an attorney. The City of Alexandria Employees Credit Union, Inc. (credit union) (defendant) was one of Ryan’s clients. The credit union also regularly requested credit reports from a credit bureau. Ryan requested the credit union’s manager to run a credit check on Yohay, later testifying that she made the request to ensure that Yohay was not using a joint credit card account the two had previously shared. The manager who obtained the report for Ryan was friends with Ryan and Ryan’s new husband. Although the credit union had a contract with the credit bureau for using the reports for appropriate purposes, later testimony established that virtually anyone who had access to the credit union could obtain a credit report. When Yohay learned that the credit bureau had given his credit information to the credit union, he contacted the credit union and learned that the credit union had disclosed his information. Yohay then sued the credit union for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), seeking punitive damages for the allegedly willful violation. Yohay did not, however, seek compensatory damages. The credit union sued Ryan in a third-party complaint. The case went to a jury trial, which resulted in a $10,000 punitive-damages award for Yohay. The credit union and Ryan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership