Youst v. Longo
California Supreme Court
43 Cal. 3d 64 (1987)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Harlan Youst (plaintiff) entered his horse, Bat Champ, into a race. Gerald Longo (defendant) rode another horse, The Thilly Brudder, in the same race. During the race, Longo allegedly rode The Thilly Brudder into Bat Champ’s track and hit Bat Champ with a whip. Bat Champ finished fifth in the race, winning Youst $5,000, and The Thilly Brudder finished second. Youst filed suit against Longo, alleging that Longo’s actions had deprived Youst of the chance of a victory for Bat Champ. Youst sought damages in the amount of the award for first, second, or third place, minus the amount actually won by Bat Champ. Youst did not allege facts showing that Bat Champ probably would have finished faster without Longo’s interference. Longo filed a demurrer, which the trial court sustained. The court of appeal affirmed. Youst appealed to the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lucas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.