Yousuf v. Samantar
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
699 F.3d 763 (2012)
- Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Facts
Mohamed Ali Samantar (defendant) was a former Somalia official who committed violations of jus cogens norms including torture, murder, and arbitrary imprisonment of politicians and ethnic groups. Bashe Abdi Yousuf (plaintiff) sued Samantar in the United States under the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 and the Alien Tort Statute. Samantar filed a motion to dismiss, claiming he was immune from suit because he was protected under head-of-state immunity and official-act immunity. The Department of State submitted a statement of interest (SOI) to the district court opposing Samantar’s immunity because (1) Somalia was no longer a recognized country and (2) Samantar was a permanent legal resident of the United States and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of United States courts. The district court gave absolute deference to the Department of State’s SOI and denied Samantar’s motion to dismiss. Samantar appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Traxler, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.