Ypsilanti Fire Marshal v. Kircher
Michigan Court of Appeals
730 N.W.2d 481 (2007)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
David Kircher (defendant) owned dilapidated buildings with multiple serious fire code violations. The Ypsilanti Fire Marshal (plaintiff) brought a nuisance-abatement action to compel Kircher to make repairs, but Kircher did not comply with the court’s orders. Ypsilanti asked the court to appoint a receiver and foreclose on liens to repair one of the buildings. After specifically finding the building a dangerous nuisance under the fire code, the court appointed a receiver with directions “to make the building economically viable and functional” and charge Kircher the cost. Kircher appealed, arguing that the court could not order receivership when other adequate legal remedies existed, but his appellate brief did not explain which other legal remedies were available. In addition, Kircher argued that the court abused its discretion appointing a receiver without judicial oversight over the receiver’s activities and spending.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jansen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.