Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. (Luxembourg) v. OAO Rosneft (Russian Federation)
Amsterdam Court of Appeal
ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2009:BI2451 (2009)
- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. (Yukos Capital) (plaintiff) was a member of a Russian group of companies involved in oil production. Yukos Capital loaned money to a company called Neftegaz under a loan agreement. Neftegaz was owned entirely by a related company, Yukos Oil Company. Yukos Oil Company was accused of tax evasion and, upon being assessed exceptionally large tax liabilities, was forced into bankruptcy. OAO Rosneft (Rosneft) (defendant), which was owned by the Russian government, acquired the majority of Yukos Oil Company’s assets through the bankruptcy, including the shares in Neftegaz. The Russian state also brought criminal proceedings against the former chairman of the board of directors of Yukos Oil Company, who was also a political opponent of Vladimir Putin. Yukos Capital brought several arbitration proceedings against Neftegaz seeking to enforce the loan agreement. The arbitral panel issued several awards directing Neftegaz to pay Yukos Capital approximately 13 billion rubles. Neftegaz merged with Rosneft and ceased to exist. Rosneft then brought actions in Russian court to have the awards in favor of Yukos Capital annulled. The Russian court annulled the awards, and Yukos Capital brought an action in the Netherlands seeking enforcement of the awards. Yukos Capital submitted evidence of the Russian judiciary’s lack of impartiality and bias toward the Russian government.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.