Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Zabloski v. Hall

Minnesota Court of Appeals
418 N.W.2d 187 (1988)


Facts

Andrea Zabloski (plaintiff) and Daryl Hall (defendant) had a single sexual encounter, and Zabloski gave birth to a son in January 1984. Zabloski and Hall lived two different lifestyles. Zabloski lived in relative poverty, received public assistance, and shared a one-bedroom home with her two minor children. Hall was a rock star whose net income was $1.4 million per year. Despite his hefty income, Hall lived a relatively frugal lifestyle and desired the same for his son. In April 1984, Zabloski commenced a parentage action. Hall acknowledged paternity; thus, the only issues for court determination were custody, the amount of child support, and the award of attorney fees. Zabloski proposed a monthly budget to the court totaling $3,143.00, which was a steep increase from her former standard of living. The minor child was a normal, healthy three-year-old with no medical problems, learning disabilities, or any other special needs that required an extraordinary level of support. Thus, the trial court followed the Minnesota statutory support guidelines and ordered Hall to pay child support of $1,000 per month, provide health and dental coverage for the child, and pay for any uninsured medical or dental expenses. Zabloski appealed, seeking an upward deviation of the amount of child support owed by Hall.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Crippen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.