Zacarias v. Allstate Insurance Company
New Jersey Supreme Court
775 A.2d 1262 (2001)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Joao Zacarias (plaintiff) insured his boat under a $500,000 liability insurance policy with Allstate Insurance Company (defendant). The policy was 18 pages long, plus a two-page declarations sheet. The policy used large and bold type, with clearly spaced sections. On page three, the definitions section defined “insured person” to include “you and, if a resident of your household, . . . any relative.” On pages 12 and 13, the noncovered losses section included an intra-family exclusion that read: “We do not cover bodily injury to an insured person.” The declarations sheet outlined the coverages and liability limits and said it was subject to the policy provisions but did not list the intrafamilial exclusion. Zacarias allegedly negligently operated his boat with his wife on board, causing her injuries. Allstate denied coverage based on the intra-family exclusion, and Zacarias’s wife sued him for her injuries. Zacarias filed a lawsuit asking the court to either declare the exclusion void or indemnify him because Allstate did not inform him of it. The court granted Allstate summary judgment, dismissing Zacarias’s claims. The appellate court affirmed, with the majority finding the policy clear and unambiguous. One judge dissented, reasoning that the court should read the policy to conform to the insured’s reasonable expectations, especially given that Zacarias bought insurance intending to cover any liability claims arising from using his boat. Zacarias appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Verniero, J.)
Dissent (Long, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.