Zambelli Fireworks Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Wood
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
592 F.3d 412 (2010)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co., Inc. d/b/a/ Zambelli Fireworks Internationale (Zambelli) (plaintiff) is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in New Castle, Pennsylvania. Matthew Wood, a Florida resident, signed an employment agreement with Zambelli that contained a two-year restrictive covenant not to compete. Despite this, shortly after leaving Zambelli, Wood went to work for a competitor, Pyrotecnico F/X, LLC (Pyrotecnico) (defendant). Pyrotecnico is a limited liability company (LLC) registered in the State of Nevada. Pyrotecnico’s only member is Pyrotecnico of Louisiana, LLC, an LLC registered in Louisiana. Zambelli sued Wood and Pyrotecnico to enforce the restrictive covenant in federal court under diversity jurisdiction, alleging that it was a citizen of Pennsylvania, Wood was a citizen of Florida, and Pyrotecnico was a citizen of Nevada. Nevertheless, at trial, Stephen Vitale, the managing member of Pyrotecnico of Louisiana, LLC testified that he resided and worked at Pyrotecnico’s New Castle, Pennsylvania headquarters. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sua sponte, determined that the parties might not be diverse and requested supplemental briefs on jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.