Zambrano v. Office National de l'Emploi
European Union Court of Justice
Case C-34/098 (8 March 2011) (2011)
- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano (plaintiff) and his wife, nationals of Columbia, applied for and were denied asylum in Belgium. Belgium did not repatriate the Zambranos due to the Columbian civil war. Instead, the Zambranos remained in and registered as residents of Belgium. Despite not holding employment authorization, Gerardo Zambrano worked for a limited period. The Zambranos had two children who were born in Belgium. Both children were Belgian nationals because of their births within the country and citizens of the European Union (EU). When the Zambranos applied for residence permits and unemployment benefits, the Office National de l’Emploi (defendant) denied the applications. Subsequently, Gerardo Zambrano appealed, claiming he had a direct right to residence and employment. In the alternative, Zambrano argued that he possessed a derivative right to residence as the parent of two Belgian nationals. The Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (employment tribunal of Brussels) stayed proceedings and referred the question of whether Belgium’s denial of Zambrano’s applications is prohibited as infringing on the rights of his Belgium-born children enshrined within the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the treaty).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.