Zamlen v. City of Cleveland

906 F.2d 209 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zamlen v. City of Cleveland

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
906 F.2d 209 (1990)

Facts

In 1983, the City of Cleveland (city) (defendant) designed and administered an entry-level firefighter examination. The examination consisted of three events that simulated actual firefighting tasks. A barbell-lift event was designed to simulate the use of a pike pole to tear out ceilings. A fire-scene setup and tower-climb event were intended to simulate setting up ladders and climbing stairs. Finally, a dummy-drag event simulated the rescue of a disabled person. There was evidence indicating that higher test scores directly correlated with higher supervisor ratings. But no women were hired as firefighters in 1983. Several women (plaintiffs) who had unsuccessfully applied to be firefighters brought suit against the city. These female applicants contended that the examination had a disparate impact on women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). The district court found in favor of the city. The female applicants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Norris, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership