Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Zarky v. Commissioner

123 T.C. 132 (2004)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Zarky v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

123 T.C. 132 (2004)

Facts

In 1999, Michael Zarky (plaintiff) received $874 in interest from a savings account and approximately $200,000 from brokerage sales. The bank administering the savings account withheld and remitted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) $270 in taxes. Zarky did not file a tax return for the 1999 tax year. The IRS determined that Zarky should have included the brokerage sales in his taxable income and mailed Zarky a notice of deficiency in February 2003. Zarky filed a petition in the United States Tax Court challenging the deficiency and seeking a refund for the $270 in withheld taxes. At the Tax Court, the IRS conceded that it was wrong about the inclusion of the brokerage-sale revenue and that Zarky had, in fact, overpaid his 1999 taxes by $270. Nevertheless, the IRS argued that Zarky was time-barred from claiming the refund.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Laro, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership