From our private database of 15,100+ case briefs...

Zeran v. Diamond Broadcasting, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
203 F.3d 714 (2000)


In 1999, a federal building in Oklahoma City was bombed. The bombing received widespread national attention. Shortly after the bombing, an America Online user named KenZZ03 began posting listings for bombing-related apparel on an Internet bulletin board. The shirts made light of the bombing in poor taste and featured slogans such as “Visit Oklahoma—it’s a Blast.” The posting included a phone number for call-in orders. The phone number provided was the business number of Kenneth Zeran (plaintiff), a Seattle-based artist who had nothing to do with the posting. On the day of the first posting, Zeran began receiving threatening phone calls. Despite Zeran’s requests to have the postings removed, the postings remained on the Internet for at least a week. Approximately a week after the first posting, the hosts of KRXO, an Oklahoma City-based radio station owned by Diamond Broadcasting, Inc. (Diamond) (defendant), began discussing the posting on their live radio show. The hosts read the phone number attached to the posting and encouraged listeners to contact KenZZ03 and tell him what they thought about him for offering the offensive products. Zeran received roughly 80 angry phone calls, including death threats, and had to be prescribed anti-anxiety medication by his doctor. KRXO broadcast a retraction at Zeran’s request, but Zeran brought an action for damages against Diamond, including a claim of defamation. The district court granted Diamond’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Zeran had failed to prove the required elements of a defamation claim. Zeran appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Kimball, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 288,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 15,100 briefs, keyed to 205 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.