Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Zerby v. Warren

210 N.W.2d 58 (1973)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Zerby v. Warren

Minnesota Supreme Court

210 N.W.2d 58 (1973)

Facts

Steven Zerby (plaintiff), age 14, went with Randy Rieken, age 13, to a store owned by Chester Warren (defendant). Robert Dieke (defendant) worked as a clerk at Warren’s store. Dieke sold two pints of glue to Rieken. The glue contained toluene, an aromatic hydrocarbon solvent that, if inhaled, is toxic to the central-nervous system. A few hours later, Zerby and Rieken intentionally sniffed the glue. The glue’s fumes affected Zerby’s central-nervous system, causing him to fall into a creek and drown. Minnesota Statute 145.38 prohibited selling glues containing aromatic hydrocarbon solvents to minors. Minnesota Statute 145.39 prohibited minors from recreationally using glues containing aromatic hydrocarbon solvents or aiding minors in doing so. Zerby’s family sued the defendants for the wrongful death of their son. The defendants sued Rieken for contributory negligence, and Zerby’s family added a claim against Rieken. The defendants and Rieken each raised the affirmative defenses of comparative negligence and assumption of risk by Zerby. In a pretrial ruling, the trial court held that the defendants were subject to absolute liability and denied the use of comparative negligence or assumption of risk as defenses. Ruling on stipulated facts, the trial court found in favor of Zerby and denied the defendants’ claim against Rieken. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership