Ziccarelli v. Dart
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
35 F.4th 1079 (2022)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Salvatore Ziccarelli (plaintiff) worked as a corrections officer for the Cook County Sheriff’s Office (the sheriff’s office) (defendant). At various points during Ziccarelli’s employment, Ziccarelli developed serious health conditions and took leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In July 2016, Ziccarelli began receiving treatment for work-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). By September 2016, Ziccarelli had used 304 of his available 480 hours of FMLA leave for 2016. Ziccarelli wanted to enroll in an eight-week PTSD-treatment program, and he contacted the sheriff’s office’s FMLA manager, Wylola Shinnawi (defendant), to inquire about combining his available FMLA leave with other leave time to attend the program. According to Ziccarelli, Shinnawi told Ziccarelli that Ziccarelli had already taken “serious amounts of FMLA” and would be disciplined for taking more. Although Shinnawi did not explain how Ziccarelli would be disciplined, Ziccarelli feared that he might be fired. According to Shinnawi, Ziccarelli requested to take several months of leave, and Shinnawi told Ziccarelli that Ziccarelli did not have enough FMLA hours available. Shinnawi then purportedly explained that if Ziccarelli tried to use more FMLA leave than he had available, the leave would be considered unauthorized and reviewed by the sheriff’s office’s attendance-review program. Ziccarelli retired from the sheriff’s office shortly after speaking with Shinnawi. Ziccarelli subsequently sued the sheriff’s office, Shinnawi, and other county officials (collectively, the county) (defendants), asserting that the county had interfered with Ziccarelli’s FMLA rights. Ziccarelli further asserted that the county had constructively discharged him in retaliation for inquiring about using FMLA leave. The district court granted summary judgment for the county. Ziccarelli appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.