Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.

516 U.S. 217 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.

United States Supreme Court
516 U.S. 217 (1996)

  • Written by Elizabeth Yingling, JD

Facts

A Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. (KAL) (defendant) flight on route from Alaska to South Korea unintentionally crossed into Soviet Union air space and was shot down over the Sea of Japan. All aboard the KAL flight were killed. Marjorie Zicherman and Muriel Mahalek (collectively, Zicherman) (plaintiffs), relatives of one of the deceased passengers, sued KAL in the Southern District of New York for loss-of-society damages—that is, loss of love, affection, and companionship. KAL filed a motion seeking a determination that the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA) applied to the damages claim and precluded loss-of-society damages. Section 762 of DOHSA allowed for the recovery of “pecuniary loss sustained by the persons for whose benefit the suit is brought.” Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention provided for the recovery of “dommage,” which in French legal usage means “legally cognizable harm.” Zicherman argued that the plain meaning of the English translation of “dommage,” which include “damage” or “harm,” was broad enough to include loss-of-society damages. The United States had ratified the Warsaw Convention as the law of the land. After ratification of the Warsaw Convention, the signatory countries indicated that domestic law would determine the type of harm that was recoverable. The parties agreed that if the Warsaw Convention did not resolve the issue of compensable harm, then United States law would govern the claim. The district court denied KAL’s motion, and the jury awarded loss-of-society damages. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit set aside the damages award, holding that general maritime law governed the claim. Zicherman filed a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership