From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Zino Davidoff SA v. CVS Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
571 F.3d 238 (2009)
Zino Davidoff SA (Davidoff) (plaintiff) produced a brand of colognes for men and women. Davidoff trademarked the “Cool Water” brand of its colognes. Davidoff had a quality assurance and anti-counterfeiting program. Davidoff placed a unique production code (UPC) on each fragrance bottle and package, and Davidoff used this system to identify when counterfeit versions of its fragrances were being sold. If a bottle or package was missing a UPC or had a fake UPC, Davidoff and investigators would know that it was a counterfeit bottle. The UPC also enabled Davidoff to track down bottles from specific shipments or producers if there was a quality issue with them. Davidoff had declined to sell its fragrances at CVS Corporation (CVS) (defendant). Instead, CVS obtained Davidoff’s fragrances from other distributors. In 1998 and 2005, Davidoff discovered that its products were being sold at CVS without authorization. CVS agreed that it would remove the counterfeit products and only obtain future products from an authorized distributor. However, in 2006, Davidoff discovered that CVS was still selling counterfeit fragrances and sued CVS. CVS agreed to stop selling counterfeit products but did not agree to stop selling the legitimate fragrances that had no UPC labels. Davidoff filed for a preliminary injunction to prevent CVS from selling any of its fragrances that had no UPC labels. The district court granted Davidoff’s motion, and CVS appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leval, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.