Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Zion v. Kurtz

405 N.E.2d 681 (1980)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Zion v. Kurtz

Court of Appeals of New York

405 N.E.2d 681 (1980)

Play video

Facts

Harold Kurtz (defendant) formed Lombard-Wall Group, Inc., and was initially its sole stockholder. In a transaction with Abraham Zion (plaintiff), Zion acquired all of the Group’s Class A stock, and Kurtz retained all of the Class B stock. Zion and Kurtz entered into a shareholders’ agreement, which provided that the company would not engage in any business or activities without the consent of the holders of the Class A stock. The agreement states that it is to be construed, enforced, and governed according to the General Corporation Law of Delaware. The Group’s articles of incorporation do not refer to the veto power of the Class A stockholders. Kurtz agreed in the stockholders’ agreement to take any further actions necessary to give effect to the provisions and intent of the agreement. While Kurtz was the sole stockholder and director of the Group, and as part of the transaction in which Zion became a stockholder, Kurtz also agreed in writing that he was authorized and empowered to take any further actions necessary to give effect to the stockholders’ agreement. The board of directors approved two agreements over Zion’s objection. Zion brought suit to have the two agreements canceled as violating the shareholders’ agreement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Meyer, J.)

Dissent (Gabrielli, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership