Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Zion v. Kurtz

Court of Appeals of New York
405 N.E.2d 681 (1980)


Facts

Harold Kurtz (defendant) formed Lombard-Wall Group, Inc., and was initially its sole stockholder. In a transaction with Abraham Zion (plaintiff), Zion acquired all of the Group’s Class A stock, and Kurtz retained all of the Class B stock. Zion and Kurtz entered into a shareholders’ agreement, which provided that the company would not engage in any business or activities without the consent of the holders of the Class A stock. The agreement states that it is to be construed, enforced, and governed according to the General Corporation Law of Delaware. The Group’s articles of incorporation do not refer to the veto power of the Class A stockholders. Kurtz agreed in the stockholders’ agreement to take any further actions necessary to give effect to the provisions and intent of the agreement. While Kurtz was the sole stockholder and director of the Group, and as part of the transaction in which Zion became a stockholder, Kurtz also agreed in writing that he was authorized and empowered to take any further actions necessary to give effect to the stockholders’ agreement. The board of directors approved two agreements over Zion’s objection. Zion brought suit to have the two agreements canceled as violating the shareholders’ agreement.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Meyer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Gabrielli, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.