Zivkovich v. Vatican Bank

242 F. Supp. 2d 659 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zivkovich v. Vatican Bank

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
242 F. Supp. 2d 659 (2002)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

George Zivkovich (plaintiff) brought an action against the Vatican’s bank, Istituto per le Opere di Religione (IOR), and the Order of Friars Minor (OFM) (defendants) for conversion, unjust enrichment, restitution, an accounting, and international-law violations. Zivkovich alleged that (1) he was born in April 1936 in Yugoslavia and was Serbian Orthodox; (2) the Ustasha regime in Yugoslavia operated as a Nazi protectorate from 1941 to 1945; (3) he and his mother were arrested and sent to concentration camps along with other Serbs, Jews, and Roma; (4) his mother was murdered after he and his mother were returned to their home in 1942; (5) his grandfather Damjan Janus, who was a wealthy goods trader, was forced from his home and had his belongings looted before being murdered by the Ustasha when Zivkowich was three years old; (6) the assets looted by the Ustasha (the Ustasha treasury) were transferred to banks to fund the Nazi war effort; (7) after the Ustasha regime fell in 1945, the Ustasha treasury was transferred to clergymen for transport to Rome; (8) according to intelligence reports and other reports, Ustasha were caught trying to escape with 350 million Swiss francs worth of gold, 200 million Swiss francs were transferred to Vatican City and the IOR with the assistance of the OFM, and 2,400 kilograms of stolen gold were moved from the Vatican to one of the Vatican’s secret Swiss bank accounts; and (9) the IOR and OFM used the Ustasha treasury to help Nazi war criminals escape and to finance post-war Ustasha activities. The IOR and OFM moved to dismiss on grounds, among others, that Zivkovich lacked standing.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jenkins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership